Skip to content

RCMP Commissioner Paulson’s Message to Rank and File on Patrol Carbines

Jul 19

There is a Maclean’s article this week that is very critical of the Force, and me in particular, for the manner in which we rolled out the carbines in the context of recent events in Moncton and the murder of our three colleagues.

It’s important for me, for you, for the Force to understand the factors which have contributed to these deaths.  That’s why I asked for an immediate review of the circumstances which gave rise to this tragedy: so we can learn and adjust quickly. I’ve written you already about retired A/Commr. Phonse MacNeil’s ongoing review.  It’s also why the Employment and Social Development Canada Health and Safety Officer and the RCMP internal Hazardous Occurrence Investigation Team investigations were initiated.

This Maclean’s article though, is not a fair representation of what has happened.

A lot of people in the Force have worked long and very hard to properly get us to where we are in the roll out of these weapons. I maintain that it is a shallow and easy analysis of these murders to link them to the absence of the carbine in the way some people are doing.

From the outset, our strategy for the selection and acquisition of a carbine was framed to do it on a foundation of reliable evidence based analysis of our needs.

We all knew instinctively we needed to acquire a carbine, but we needed to objectively demonstrate our need and document our analysis.

We were working on this well before the Mayerthorpe Inquiry recommended we get one. We  knew that the addition of another deadly force option, at a time when we were being condemned for our CEW and broader use of force practices, would require a careful and formal analysis of the need for the carbine, together with the creation of precise policies on its use, its distribution and training.

It is insufficient these days to simply say “everybody said we needed them therefore we got them.” That’s why receiving the Davies report was so disappointing.  It was submitted late and fell far short of the requirements that had been plainly set out in the statement of work. Sure it said everybody thinks we need a carbine, we knew that. Sure it said hurry up and get it into the hands of the front line member. That’s what we were trying to do.  What the report didn’t do was to produce an objective, evidence based analysis of our need that would position us to acquire and deploy the carbine in our reality.

It did not provide the critical analysis that the Force and our members would need to defend against criticism for its use when, ultimately it got used.  I was disappointed and in June 2010 I wrote Mr. Davies and told him so.

But just because I was disappointed with this deficient report doesn’t mean we stopped or abandoned the project.  To the contrary, we had already engaged Defence Research Development Canada by this time in an effort to do the proper analysis and ultimately this allowed us to move forward, identify the Colt C8, and put it in our inventory.

We developed reasonable training standards in line with 9 of the 18 Canadian Police Services we studied.  We prepared policies, procurement plans, maintenance, risk assessments and a host of other processes and systems that had to be in place.  We succeeded in getting the first carbine out the door in 2013.

Yes we have been carefully deliberate in the roll out and yes, it may be that some aspects could have gone quicker but we currently have 1330 out there, another 219 arriving in October and more coming.

It’s easy to second guess and criticise from the sidelines.  Sensational really,  especially after the murder of our members, to say “I told those guys to buy the carbines in 2010 all at once and get them out there.”  But that isn’t reasonable or practical.   Frankly, these claims are consistent with the kind of analysis we were provided in the deficient report in the first place.

My purpose in writing today is not to be defensive, if there are things we need to change we will.  I just want to balance the criticism in the
Maclean’s story with reality.  I’m not opposed to criticism, I welcome it. I just ask that it be accurate and factual.

All that said none of it helps our departed members, Doug, Dave, Fabrice or their families. I ask you not to disrespect their service and their
sacrifice by unfairly and prematurely judging how or why they died. Let’s get an analysis of what happened and make our decisions and judgments on the back of evidence.

Bob Paulson

  1. Really strange thinking, we had the 308 patrol carbine, was part of annual qualification and depot training. It came out often but just the sight of it would turn would be criminals to say I give up. Paulson stop thinking PR and start thinking of your men.

    • Highlander permalink

      I remember doing a reserve military war games exercise at my armory and when I stopped a car pulling into the parking lot. I wasn’t overbearing and hostile to the guy, but he just about shit his pants when he saw the weapon in my hands. Poor guy guy was stuttering.

  2. Paulson only thinks of himself! He writes “My purpose in writing today is not to be defensive” yeah right, his purpose is to try to do damage control. He must still think that all members are still living under a rock.

  3. Christian Thibaudeau permalink

    “I just ask that it be accurate and factual.” Very simple, Moncton incident aside, when it takes 6-8-10 plus years to study approve and distribute a carbine for patrol members, it is accurate and factual to believe that the RCMP procurement process needs a serious overall. Especially on something as simple as buying and distributing carbines that have been proven over and over with military and police forces around the world. Could it be about saving money or incompetency of the people involved in the process.?

  4. Anonymous permalink

    Where is the accountability on Bob?. When and where does HE have to answer for this?. Every front line member has a microscope inserted rectally for each report he writes, but Bob, who is responsible for membership safety gets to send out the odd email saying not to jump to conclusions. When was the last time he was going to a weapons call?. He is full of himself at the cost of others lives. ANY person who has shot both a pistol and a rifle can tell you which one is easier to hit at for longer ranges. Yet, RCMP leadership has sat on it’s thumb for over 9 fucking years since Mayorthorp and still these poor bastards did not have a effective, available way to return fire to someone who was shooting at them with a ex US military Battle rifle. This is why I hate the RCMP


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: