Skip to content

PTSD: Is That All There Is?

Dec 18

I recently did a radio interview following the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass murder, where I was asked about the likelihood of first responders suffering PTSD.  I seem to have left many of you (thank you for the emails) with the impression that I don’t recognize the disorder.  Even the reporter who conducted the interview was taken aback by what I was saying.  I apologize if I wasn’t clear, but here is what I was trying to communicate to you in a 90 second sound bite.

The media and many mental health professionals tend to obsess about PTSD.  Do you recall Nietzsche’s message?  “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”.  The “adversity hypothesis”, in psychology, asserts that we need adversity, trauma, and challenges in order to grow, find fulfillment, develop as human beings and find our inner strength (resilience).  For many thousands of years the human organism has been confronted with a variety of traumatic stressors, most of which outstrip any of those that exist in modern life.  If we weren’t a naturally resilient species we would have perished long ago.

I teach a course on resilience.  At the beginning of the course (could be police persons or military personnel) I often ask, “How many have heard of PTSD?”  As you would expect almost all the hands go up.  Then I ask, “How many have heard of PTG?”  Most often the candidates sit with blank looks on their faces, staring at each other.

Just imagine now, if all you know is PTSD and you get tearful and “bummed out” after being exposed to a traumatic or oppressive event – what are you going to think?  Of course, you will begin to catastrophize about having PTSD and being condemned to life as an emotional cripple.  On the other hand, if you are somewhat psychologically literate and understand that getting upset after a stressful event is a normal, typical reaction and that the usual course of events involves resilience and often post traumatic growth (PTG) – the downward spiral stops.

In an effort to increase your psychological literacy let me share some illustrative data with you:

  • Research has consistently shown that from the time of WWI, veterans as a group resume normal lives, are less likely to be incarcerated, have higher education, and generally achieve more success upon return to civilian life than do their non-serving peers.
  • Following combat exposure, somewhere between 10-20% of soldiers may evidence post traumatic responses, anxiety, depression, and other related adjustment problems.  But the majority (80%+) do not!
  • The majority of Viet Nam veterans (70%) appraised the impact of their service on their present lives as “mainly positive”.  Over 40% of the veterans felt that the war’s influence was still highly important in their lives.
  • The vast majority of Viet Nam veterans are as well adjusted as, or even more successful than, their non-serving civilian peers.
  • Studies of enlisted service members in Viet Nam indicate that 10-15% used narcotics, but follow-up assessments back home indicated only an incidence of 1% continuing addictive behaviours.
  • A massive study of soldiers and their families in Operation Desert Storm found that 62-73% of respondents felt that they had readjusted to family life within 1 month of returning home; 17-21% had readjusted after several months; and only 8-17% were still adjusting 2 years after returning (single parents predominating this group).
  • A survey of US Army spouses indicated some 58% believed that deployment had strengthened their marriage; 31% believed it had no effect; and only 10% felt it had weakened their marriage.
  • Although deployment can be quite stressful, these studies have shown that many families report that outcomes have included the development of new skills, new competencies, a greater sense of independence, and self reliance.
  • Children in military families are typically resilient even after experiencing significant trauma and family deaths.

The evidence for resilience following trauma exposure is evident in civilian populations as well.  Several researchers have reviewed data from Holocaust survivors, bereaved individuals, cancer and HIV/AIDS survivors, torture victims, victims of sexual abuse, rape, and survivors of terrorist attacks and natural disasters who exhibit remarkable resilience.  Over time, many of these individuals report that their lives have improved as a result of these traumatic exposures.  These outcomes have been characterized as “post traumatic growth”.

Two outstanding examples highlight the pervasive incidence of resilience following traumatic exposures.  (In the US it is estimated that 50-60% of adults have been exposed to a traumatic event; but only 5-10% have developed a post traumatic response or related clinical problems).  Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York City, only 7.5% of Manhattan residents manifested clinical problems, and this decreased to less that 1% at 6 months.  The residents of London England demonstrated similar resilience following the subway bombings of July 7, 2005.  Less than 1% of those directly affected enlisted professional help.  Victims from these two examples, like most of us, turned to natural social supports, and their faith for comfort, support, and healing.

It can safely be said that following exposure to traumatic events most people will readjust successfully.  Resilience is the rule not the exception!  Moreover, resilience is not only not unique but also not a sign of exceptional strength.  It is a fundamental feature of normal coping and has been called by one researcher, “ordinary magic”.

With regard to “coping styles”, they are very personal and incorporate a wide range of effective strategies some of which are frowned upon by some mental health professionals; such as denial, egocentric bias bordering on narcissism, repression, blind faith in one’s own ability to cope, and smiling or laughing through the post incident phase.  A leading researcher/therapist in the area of resilience has termed this, “coping ugly”.  It seems that some people may not do what some mental health professionals think they should to process the trauma, but it works for them.  Interfering with these natural coping abilities and telling people what they should be doing, may in fact do more harm than good.

I’ll conclude by quoting one of the above noted authors, “Sometimes the worst does happen, but our innate capacity to bounce back means that most of the time things will turn out alright”.  I wonder why we don’t get this side of the story from mainstream media?

Dr. Mike Webster, R.Psych.

Advertisements

From → PTSD

2 Comments
  1. Anonymous permalink

    As a RCMP members spouse whom has PTSD, I am dumb founded by your response. We have lived through 2 and a half year of isolation, discrimination and lack of any kind of support from the RCMP. I have had to be my husband’s advocate because of his illness and shame. This has taken a great toll on me and my family. Yes we are now stronger but as my husband has said he would trade in his new strength to not have had to live and put me through the RCMP’s ignorance of PTSD.
    Your statement reinforces why my husband and most PTSD suffers don’t come forward they see themselves as week. Yes you quote stats that show most don’t get PTSD. Really? Or has it just becoming ok to admit? How many did and are still hiding or covering it up with alcohol? We are finally putting an end to the just suck it up responce.
    You of all people should be promoting strong mental health and that it is a bigger person that seeks help. That feeling and being human is a sign of strength not weekness.
    Shame on you for spreading the shame of being human.

  2. Bullied and Mobbed by RCMP permalink

    To a certain degree I agree with Dr. Webster’s comments. The subsequent roadside dead bodies I saw got easier to look at. But, if this were all true about stress, than why are so many members burned out?
    My belief is that there is Stess and Eustress. Eustress is positive stress and to me is the feeling I get when I am challenged and can rise to the occasion. These are the stressful and rewarding parts of the job. Even when being attacked and stabbed with a knife I was able to quickly overcome and move on.
    But, if someone is suffering from Stress from Mobbing or Bullying at the hands of the organization, there is no making this a positive experience and adapting and overcoming is very difficult as the boundaries are always being changed so you can never fit into them. It kills who you are on the inside and shatters people’s self worth. There are many, many psychologists who don’t understand mobbing and even go so far as to mislabel their patients.
    As far as war vets are concerned I feel the ones who were involved in accidental atrocities where they inadvertently killed women and children in a village firefight would have more stress problems than just those who had killed a uniformed enemy. I also feel that the soldiers that came home to a hero’s welcome fared better than those who were spit up and called “baby killers”.
    In closing, not all stressors are the same and over time it is easy to see how it has taken it’s toll on many hard working members.

Comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: